ES-107 Outputs¶
Purpose¶
This page defines the outputs produced by ES-107 and how they support ES-108.
Required outputs¶
docs/implementation/implementation_log.md
docs/implementation/ai_assistance_log.md
docs/implementation/work_item_completion_records.md
docs/implementation/implementation_evidence.md
docs/implementation/verification_notes.md
docs/implementation/implementation_decision_records.md
docs/implementation/implementation_risk_updates.md
docs/implementation/implementation_summary.md
Code and repository outputs¶
ES-107 may also produce source code changes, test code, documentation updates, commits, branches, pull requests, build artifacts, and review notes.
These should be traceable to implementation evidence.
Output purposes¶
| Output | Purpose | Downstream Use |
|---|---|---|
| Implementation log | Records what was implemented. | Code review context |
| AI assistance log | Records AI use and verification. | AI governance and review |
| Work item completion records | Shows work item status. | Integration readiness |
| Implementation evidence | Summarizes evidence and guardrails. | ES-108 review |
| Verification notes | Records testing and checks. | Code review and testing |
| Implementation decisions | Preserves coding-level decisions. | Maintenance |
| Risk updates | Records implementation risks. | Review and planning |
| Implementation summary | States ES-108 readiness. | Code review transition |
Output quality checklist¶
Confirm that implementation is tied to work items, code changes are reviewable, AI use is disclosed where material, verification notes exist, guardrails were checked, implementation decisions are recorded, risks are updated, and readiness for ES-108 is documented.
Common pitfall
Do not enter ES-108 with undocumented implementation changes. Reviewers need context.
Engineering insight
The quality of ES-108 review depends directly on the evidence ES-107 leaves behind.