Skip to content

Monitoring and Observability Plan

LMU/COICP Example

Monitoring and Observability Plan Example

Define LMU/COICP monitoring signals for the RC-001 internal review: reviewer access, synthetic data, AI-disabled status, evidence events, handoff behavior, emergency-boundary scenarios, known defects, and feedback.

ES-111 Monitoring LMU Review Signals
← Previous Support Model
Current Monitoring and Observability Plan
Next → Incident Response Plan

Example purpose

This artifact defines what LMU will monitor during the RC-001 internal engineering review.

The plan prepares ES-113 Monitoring and Operations. It is intentionally concrete so deployment can hand off measurable signals rather than vague expectations.

Project

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control

Field Value
Artifact owner COICP Product Engineer
Primary reviewers Campus Operations lead, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Architecture Review Board chair
Status Accepted for internal engineering review monitoring
Last updated 2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage ES-111 — Operational Readiness
Project workspace target docs/project-workspace/operations/monitoring_and_observability_plan.md

Planned monitoring window

Field Value
Planned window March 18–22, 2026
Planned review sessions 5
Planned reviewer accounts 24
Planned synthetic dataset Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
Planned synthetic records 421
Monitoring owner COICP Product Owner
Technical monitoring owner Product Engineer
Access monitoring owner IT Security Reviewer
Data monitoring owner Compliance Reviewer
AI monitoring owner AI Review Lead
Evidence monitoring owner Architecture Review Board Chair

Monitoring signals

Signal LMU Source Owner Stop Trigger Evidence
Approved reviewer access Mock LMU reviewer directory IT Security Reviewer Any unapproved user Access monitoring record
Synthetic data only Dataset inspection Compliance Reviewer Real/sensitive data Data monitoring record
AI Incident Summary disabled UI/configuration inspection AI Review Lead AI control visible AI monitoring record
Evidence event on incident creation Synthetic scenario execution Architecture Review Board Chair Missing EvidenceEvent Guardrail monitoring record
Handoff evidence behavior Facilities / Residence Life scenarios Architecture Review Board Chair Missing handoff evidence Monitoring observation
Emergency-boundary behavior Campus Safety scenario Campus Safety Liaison Emergency handled as normal case Incident record
Status transition behavior DEF-001 review scenario Product Engineer Defect impacts review safety Defect update
Scope understanding Reviewer feedback Product Owner Reviewer treats as pilot Communication update

Planned LMU scenarios

Scenario ID Scenario Monitoring Focus
COICP-SYN-001 Routine facilities request in Information Commons Smoke evidence event
COICP-SYN-118 Water leak in Damen Hall requiring Facilities handoff Handoff evidence
COICP-SYN-204 Residence hall access issue requiring Residence Life coordination Cross-office visibility
COICP-SYN-219 HVAC outage affecting evening event setup Queue and owner transition
COICP-SYN-322 Emergency-related safety concern entered in wrong workflow Emergency boundary

Manual checks

  • Confirm only approved LMU reviewer accounts are active.
  • Confirm Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset is the only dataset.
  • Confirm AI Incident Summary is disabled.
  • Confirm normal incident creation produces an EvidenceEvent.
  • Confirm Facilities and Residence Life handoff scenarios produce expected evidence.
  • Confirm Campus Safety boundary scenario redirects away from normal COICP workflow.
  • Confirm known defects remain visible.
  • Confirm reviewers understand the environment is not operational.

Monitoring gaps

  • No production telemetry because production is not approved.
  • Evidence write failure simulation remains unresolved.
  • Full role-matrix testing remains incomplete.
  • AI runtime monitoring is limited because AI is disabled.
  • Emergency-boundary review uses synthetic scenarios only.

Monitoring decision

The monitoring plan is sufficient for LMU internal engineering review.

It is not sufficient for operational pilot or production use.

Continue to Incident Response Plan

Define responses to real data, access bypass, missing evidence, AI activation, and emergency-boundary misuse.

Open Incident Response Plan →