Release Governance
Template Library
Release Governance
Define release decision types, required evidence, decision authority, blocking conditions, conditional release rules, gaps, and governance decision.
Governance
Release Governance
Release Authority
Template purpose
Use this template to define how release decisions are governed.
Release governance ensures that release, pilot, review, deferral, or rejection decisions are based on evidence and accountable risk judgment.
Project
<Project name>
Document control
| Field |
Value |
| Artifact owner |
<owner> |
| Primary reviewers |
<reviewers> |
| Status |
<draft / in review / accepted / revised> |
| Last updated |
<YYYY-MM-DD> |
| Related Area |
Release governance |
| Project workspace target |
docs/project-workspace/governance/release_governance.md |
Release decision types
| Decision Type |
Meaning |
Minimum Evidence |
| Release |
Approved for intended release scope. |
<evidence> |
| Limited Pilot |
Approved for limited users, data, features, or duration. |
<evidence> |
| Internal Review Only |
Approved for internal engineering or stakeholder review only. |
<evidence> |
| Release with Conditions |
Approved only if stated conditions are met. |
<evidence> |
| Defer |
Not approved until additional work is complete. |
<evidence> |
| Reject |
Not approved and not expected to proceed in current form. |
<evidence> |
Release evidence required
| Evidence |
Source |
Required? |
Notes |
| Testing summary |
docs/project-workspace/testing/testing_readiness_summary.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
| Defect log |
docs/project-workspace/testing/defect_log.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
| Guardrail verification |
docs/project-workspace/testing/guardrail_verification.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
| AI verification |
docs/project-workspace/testing/ai_verification_record.md |
<yes/no / if applicable> |
<notes> |
| Release candidate summary |
docs/project-workspace/release/release_candidate_summary.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
| Release scope |
docs/project-workspace/release/release_scope.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
| Release decision record |
docs/project-workspace/release/release_decision_record.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
| Release conditions |
docs/project-workspace/release/release_conditions.md |
<yes/no / if conditional> |
<notes> |
| Risk assessment |
docs/project-workspace/release/defect_and_risk_assessment.md |
<yes/no> |
<notes> |
Release authority
| Role |
Authority |
Required For |
| Product Owner |
<authority> |
<decision types> |
| Architecture Lead |
<authority> |
<decision types> |
| Security / IT Lead |
<authority> |
<decision types> |
| AI Reviewer |
<authority> |
<decision types> |
| Compliance Reviewer |
<authority> |
<decision types> |
| Operations Lead |
<authority> |
<decision types> |
Release blocking conditions
| Condition |
Reason |
Authority to Clear |
<condition> |
<reason> |
<authority> |
Conditional release rules
- Conditions must be explicit.
- Scope limits must be operationally enforceable.
- Accepted risks must have owners.
- Deferred items must be visible to stewardship.
- Stop/rollback criteria must exist when risk warrants.
- AI-related conditions must include monitoring and human accountability.
- Release communication must match the actual approved scope.
Current release governance decision
Release governance gaps
| Gap |
Impact |
Action |
<gap> |
<impact> |
<action> |
Review checklist
- [ ] Release decision types are clear.
- [ ] Required evidence is defined.
- [ ] Release authority is explicit.
- [ ] Blocking conditions are defined.
- [ ] Conditional release rules are enforceable.
- [ ] Governance gaps are visible.