Design Review
LMU/COICP Example
Design Review Example
Record the LMU/COICP design review for LMU-COICP-DES-001, including scenario coverage, findings, acceptance decision, implementation carry-forward actions, and downstream testing implications.
ES-105
Review
Design Decision
Project
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control
| Field |
Value |
| Artifact owner |
COICP Product Engineer |
| Primary reviewers |
Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison |
| Status |
Accepted with carried-forward actions |
| Last updated |
2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage |
ES-105 — Design |
| Project workspace target |
docs/project-workspace/design/design_review.md |
Design context
| Field |
Value |
| Source architecture package |
ES-104 — Architecture |
| Design baseline produced |
LMU-COICP-DES-001 |
| Implementation baseline expected next |
LMU-COICP-IMPL-001 |
| Integrated baseline expected later |
LMU-COICP-INT-001 |
| Release candidate expected later |
LMU-COICP-RC-001 |
| Downstream release posture |
Internal engineering review only |
| Planned downstream review environment |
LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment |
| Planned downstream dataset |
Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset |
| Planned downstream synthetic records |
421 |
| Planned downstream reviewer accounts |
24 |
| Planned downstream review window |
March 18–22, 2026 |
| AI Incident Summary |
Deferred / disabled |
| Operational pilot |
Not approved |
Scenario coverage review
| Scenario |
Design Coverage |
Finding |
| COICP-SYN-001 Information Commons leak |
create incident, evidence event |
sufficient for implementation |
| COICP-SYN-118 Damen Hall water leak |
handoff, owner change, evidence timeline, future review package |
evidence failure behavior must be verified |
| COICP-SYN-204 Mertz Hall door access issue |
Residence Life access scope, denied export |
role matrix must be tested |
| COICP-SYN-219 Cudahy Science HVAC outage |
status update, closure rationale, evidence event |
invalid transition risk must be tested |
| COICP-SYN-322 emergency-related safety concern |
emergency-boundary block and redirection |
wording requires Campus Safety confirmation |
| COICP-SYN-407 Mundelein Wi-Fi disruption |
ownership and IT handoff scenario |
useful but not required for first increment |
Findings
| ID |
Finding |
Severity |
Action |
Owner |
Status |
| DRF-001 |
COICP-SYN-118 handoff evidence depends on reliable EvidenceEvent writes. |
High |
Carry to implementation and ES-109 TC-007. |
COICP Product Engineer / ARB chair |
Open |
| DRF-002 |
Residence Life and Facilities role boundaries are clear but require matrix testing. |
Medium |
Carry to implementation and ES-109 access tests. |
IT security reviewer |
Open |
| DRF-003 |
AI Incident Summary disabled behavior is clear. |
Medium |
Preserve feature-disabled state through implementation and release. |
AI reviewer |
Open |
| DRF-004 |
COICP-SYN-322 emergency-boundary behavior is designed, but final wording needs Campus Safety approval. |
Medium |
Carry to implementation and testing. |
Campus Safety liaison |
Open |
| DRF-005 |
Closure rationale for COICP-SYN-219 is designed, but status transition rules require implementation detail. |
Medium |
Define transition table in implementation readiness. |
COICP Product Engineer |
Open |
| DRF-006 |
Review package for COICP-SYN-118 should be deferred until evidence timeline stabilizes. |
Medium |
Defer export implementation if needed. |
ARB chair / Product Engineer |
Open |
Review decision
Accepted with carried-forward actions. The design package is specific enough for ES-106 Implementation Readiness.