LMU/COICP Governance Example

LMU/COICP Example

Governance Example

Bring the LMU/COICP engineering cycle together by governing the RC-001 internal review evidence, AI boundary, release posture, exceptions, stewardship decisions, and next-cycle controls before any pilot can be reconsidered.

Cross-Cutting Governance Package LMU Control System

Example AreaLMU/COICP

Current PageGovernance Example

FocusLMU/COICP governance evidence

UseRead completed cross-cutting governance artifacts

Repository Areadocs/examples/lmu-coicp/governance/

← Back Stewardship Summary

Current Governance Example

Next → Governance Model

Purpose

This directory contains the completed cross-cutting governance example for the LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform.

Governance is the final cross-cutting control layer for the LMU/COICP example. It does not replace the stage evidence in Vision, Requirements, Planning, Architecture, Design, Implementation, Integration, Testing, Release, Operations, Deployment, Monitoring, or Stewardship. It ties those stage outputs together into accountable decision rules.

The governance conclusion is clear:

LMU/COICP governance is sufficient for continued internal engineering review.
LMU/COICP governance is not sufficient for operational pilot expansion.

Governance context

Field	Value
Project	LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Release candidate	LMU-COICP-RC-001
Deployment ID	DEP-LMU-COICP-2026-03-18-001
Review environment	LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Review window	March 18–22, 2026
Dataset	Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
Stewardship decision	Continue internal review; do not expand to pilot
Governance posture	Governed for internal review only
AI Incident Summary	Disabled
Operational pilot	Not approved

Recommended workflow

Governance Model
      ↓
AI Governance
      ↓
Evidence Governance
      ↓
Risk and Exception Governance
      ↓
Release Governance
      ↓
Stewardship Governance
      ↓
Governance Readiness Summary
      ↓
LMU/COICP Example Closeout

Repository location

docs/examples/lmu-coicp/governance/

In a project workspace, the comparable evidence would normally live under:

docs/project-workspace/governance/

Example set

01

Governance Model

Define LMU governance roles, authority, decision rules, escalation rules, and evidence dependencies.

02

AI Governance

Govern AI-assisted engineering and keep AI Incident Summary disabled until a future readiness cycle approves it.

03

Evidence Governance

Govern evidence creation, review, preservation, gaps, and pilot-readiness limits.

04

Risk and Exception Governance

Govern release-blocking risks, accepted exceptions, escalation triggers, and visibility rules.

05

Release Governance

Govern internal review, pilot, release, deferral, and release expansion decisions.

06

Stewardship Governance

Govern how monitoring evidence becomes learning, backlog action, owner accountability, and next-cycle routing.

07

Governance Readiness Summary

Summarize governance readiness, gaps, conditions, and the final LMU/COICP example decision.

Completion expectations

Question	Evidence
Who governs LMU/COICP decisions?	governance_model.md
How is AI governed?	ai_governance.md
How is evidence governed?	evidence_governance.md
How are risks and exceptions governed?	risk_and_exception_governance.md
How are release decisions governed?	release_governance.md
How are stewardship decisions governed?	stewardship_governance.md
Is governance ready for pilot?	governance_readiness_summary.md

Governance Boundary

The LMU/COICP governance package does not approve pilot expansion. It formalizes why pilot expansion remains blocked and who owns the next-cycle controls.

Begin with Governance Model

Start by reviewing how LMU/COICP governance authority is structured across product, architecture, security, AI, compliance, release, and stewardship decisions.

Open Governance Model →