AI Verification Record¶
Example purpose¶
This artifact verifies the AI boundary for ES-109.
The user-facing AI Incident Summary feature is deferred for this increment. Testing therefore verifies that no unsafe partial AI path exists and that the core workflow continues without AI.
Project¶
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact owner | AI reviewer |
| Primary reviewers | Product Engineer, Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, Compliance reviewer |
| Status | Accepted for disabled AI baseline |
| Last updated | 2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage | ES-109 — Testing and Verification |
| Project workspace target | docs/project-workspace/testing/ai_verification_record.md |
Testing context¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Integrated baseline under test | LMU-COICP-INT-001 |
| Candidate produced by testing | LMU-COICP-RC-001 |
| Target release posture | Internal engineering review only |
| Planned review environment | LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment |
| Planned dataset | Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset |
| Planned synthetic records | 421 |
| Planned reviewer accounts | 24 |
| Planned review window | March 18–22, 2026 |
| AI Incident Summary | Deferred / disabled |
| Operational pilot | Not approved |
AI use status¶
AI Incident Summary is deferred and disabled for this increment. AI assisted engineering work, but no user-facing AI capability is active in the integrated baseline.
AI verification register¶
| AI Capability / Boundary | Verification Method | Result | Evidence | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No official AI summary path exists | workflow inspection | Pass | TC-008 | AI feature deferred. |
| Manual workflow works without AI | regression check | Pass | TC-009 | Core workflow continues. |
| AI output cannot bypass human review | inspection | Pass | TC-008 | No active AI output path. |
| AI-generated implementation reviewed | review record | Pass with follow-up | ES-108 AI review | Guardrail-violating suggestions rejected. |
| AI cannot send prohibited data | inspection | Pass by no active AI path | TC-008 | Future AI must test this explicitly. |
AI boundary checks¶
- [x] AI Incident Summary is not exposed in the baseline.
- [x] AI output marked. Not applicable to user-facing system because feature deferred.
- [x] AI output remains draft until human acceptance. Preserved by no active official AI path.
- [x] Human review required before official use. Preserved by design and deferment.
- [x] Rejection path exists. Deferred with AI feature.
- [x] Manual fallback exists. Core workflow works without AI.
- [x] Prohibited data excluded. No active AI data path.
- [x] AI-assisted implementation was reviewed.
- [x] No official AI summary path is integrated.
Future AI test requirements¶
If AI Incident Summary is enabled later, testing must cover:
- AI draft creation;
- draft marker;
- accept;
- edit-and-accept;
- reject;
- accepted summary evidence;
- rejected draft retention behavior;
- prohibited-data exclusion;
- prompt context metadata;
- AI unavailable fallback;
- no official use without human review;
- no autonomous closure, escalation, assignment, or external communication.
AI verification decision¶
AI boundary passes for this deferred increment.
This does not approve future AI functionality.