Estimation Record

LMU/COICP Example

Estimation Record Example

Build the LMU/COICP planning baseline around concrete scenarios that flow into Architecture and later stages.

ES-103 Estimation Planning Judgment

Example AreaLMU/COICP

Current PageEstimation Record

FocusLMU planning estimates

UseEstimate effort with uncertainty

Repository Areadocs/examples/lmu-coicp/planning/

← Previous Dependency Map

Current Estimation Record

Next → Planning Review

Example purpose

This artifact is part of the ES-103 — Planning package for the LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform. It keeps planning tied to realistic LMU business problems rather than generic categories.

Project

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control

Field	Value
Artifact owner	COICP Product Engineer
Primary reviewers	COICP Product Owner, Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison
Status	Accepted for ES-103 planning baseline
Last updated	2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage	ES-103 — Planning
Project workspace target	docs/project-workspace/planning/estimation_record.md

Planning context

Field	Value
Source requirements package	ES-102 — Requirements and Constraints
Planning baseline produced	LMU-COICP-PLAN-001
Architecture baseline expected next	LMU-COICP-ARCH-001
Design baseline expected later	LMU-COICP-DES-001
Implementation baseline expected later	LMU-COICP-IMPL-001
Integrated baseline expected later	LMU-COICP-INT-001
Release candidate expected later	LMU-COICP-RC-001
Downstream release posture	Internal engineering review only
Planned downstream review environment	LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Planned downstream dataset	Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
Planned downstream synthetic records	421
Planned downstream reviewer accounts	24
Planned downstream review window	March 18–22, 2026
AI Incident Summary	Deferred / disabled
Operational pilot	Not approved

Estimates

Work Package	Scenario Driver	Estimate	Confidence	Basis	Uncertainty
WP-001 Scenario set baseline	all	1–2 hours	Medium	product scope decision	scenario replacement pressure
WP-002 Intake workflow planning	COICP-SYN-001	1–2 hours	High	simple create flow	required field detail
WP-003 Handoff/evidence planning	COICP-SYN-118	Half day	Medium	evidence and owner-change complexity	evidence failure behavior
WP-004 Scenario-scoped role model	COICP-SYN-204	Half day	Medium	role matrix and denied actions	access conflicts
WP-005 Status/closure planning	COICP-SYN-219	1–2 hours	Medium	status progression and closure rationale	transition table detail
WP-006 Emergency-boundary planning	COICP-SYN-322	1–2 hours	Medium	boundary wording and safety review	Campus Safety language
WP-007 Optional IT handoff extension	COICP-SYN-407	30–60 minutes	Medium	extension decision only	ITSM scope drift
WP-008 AI disablement decision	all	1–2 hours	High	defer/disable through RC-001	future AI expectations
WP-009 Synthetic-data and retention review	all	Half day	Medium	compliance review	retention uncertainty
WP-010 Reviewability planning	COICP-SYN-118	1–2 hours	Medium	future review package input	export/redaction scope
WP-011 Architecture handoff package	all	1–2 hours	High	package synthesis	dependency quality
WP-012 Internal-review operations assumptions	all	1–2 hours	Medium	24 reviewers, March window	support expectations

Continue to Planning Review

Move to the next planning artifact while preserving the same LMU scenario-driven flow.

Open Planning Review →