ES-108 Outputs¶
Purpose¶
This page defines the outputs produced by ES-108 and how they support ES-109.
Required outputs¶
docs/integration/code_review_overview.md
docs/integration/pull_request_review_record.md
docs/integration/traceability_review.md
docs/integration/ai_implementation_review.md
docs/integration/guardrail_review.md
docs/integration/integration_plan.md
docs/integration/integration_verification_record.md
docs/integration/review_findings.md
docs/integration/integration_decision_record.md
docs/integration/integration_readiness_summary.md
Code and repository outputs¶
ES-108 may also produce:
- merged pull request;
- review comments;
- updated tests;
- updated implementation evidence;
- follow-up issues;
- integration verification results;
- rollback notes.
These should be traceable to the integration evidence.
Output purposes¶
| Output | Purpose | Downstream Use |
|---|---|---|
| Code review overview | Establishes review context. | Review and testing |
| Pull request review record | Records PR review decision. | Auditability |
| Traceability review | Connects code to evidence. | Testing and release |
| AI implementation review | Reviews AI-assisted code. | Governance and trust review |
| Guardrail review | Confirms controls were preserved. | Testing and governance |
| Integration plan | Defines merge and validation approach. | Integration execution |
| Integration verification record | Records integration checks. | ES-109 testing |
| Review findings | Tracks issues and resolutions. | Quality improvement |
| Integration decision record | Records accept, reject, defer, or follow-up decision. | Baseline history |
| Integration readiness summary | States ES-109 readiness. | Testing transition |
Output quality checklist¶
Confirm that review scope is clear, PR or commits are identified, traceability is documented, AI-assisted code is reviewed where applicable, guardrails are checked, verification results are recorded, findings are resolved or accepted, integration decision is explicit, and readiness for ES-109 is documented.
Common Pitfall
Do not leave review findings only inside a tool interface if the project needs durable evidence.