Review Findings¶
← Previous
Integration Verification Record
Current
Review Findings
Next →
Integration Decision Record
Example purpose¶
This artifact records findings from ES-108 integration review.
Findings make gaps visible. They distinguish between integration blockers, accepted integration risks, follow-up testing needs, and closed issues.
Project¶
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact owner | COICP Product Engineer |
| Primary reviewers | Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison |
| Status | Accepted with findings carried forward |
| Last updated | 2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage | ES-108 — Integration |
| Project workspace target | docs/project-workspace/integration/review_findings.md |
Integration context¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Integrated baseline | LMU-COICP-INT-001 |
| Candidate expected after testing | LMU-COICP-RC-001 |
| Integration decision posture | Accepted with follow-up |
| Target testing posture | Internal engineering review candidate only |
| Planned review environment | LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment |
| Planned dataset for downstream review | Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset |
| Planned synthetic records | 421 |
| Planned reviewer accounts | 24 |
| Planned review window | March 18–22, 2026 |
| AI Incident Summary | Deferred / disabled |
| Operational pilot | Not approved |
Findings¶
| ID | Finding | Severity | Source | Owner | ES-109 Mapping | Status |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| RF-001 | Access-control test coverage incomplete. | Medium | Guardrail review | IT security reviewer | DEF-002 candidate | Open |
| RF-002 | Status transition validation incomplete. | Medium | Traceability review | Product Engineer | DEF-001 candidate | Open |
| RF-003 | Evidence write failure path requires focused review. | High | Guardrail review | Architecture Review Board chair / Product Engineer | DEF-003 candidate | Open |
| RF-004 | AI Incident Summary implementation deferred. | Low | AI review | AI reviewer | AI verification focus | Closed |
| RF-005 | Retention rules unresolved. | Medium | Architecture/design carry-forward | Compliance reviewer | Release/governance risk | Open |
| RF-006 | Emergency-boundary behavior requires focused test. | Medium | Guardrail review | Product Engineer / Campus Safety liaison | DEF-004 candidate | Open |
| RF-007 | Build/test command evidence not finalized. | Medium | Integration verification | Product Engineer | DEF-005 candidate | Open |
High-severity finding¶
RF-003 — Evidence write failure path requires focused review¶
Why it matters:
If official incident state can change without a corresponding EvidenceEvent, LMU/COICP loses auditability and violates the architecture and design baseline.
Required treatment:
- add focused evidence write failure test;
- confirm official state change fails safely if evidence cannot be written;
- review before release readiness;
- keep as high-priority ES-109 focus.
Findings accepted as integration risk¶
| Finding | Rationale |
|---|---|
| RF-001 access-control coverage incomplete | Accepted only for integration because matrix testing is assigned to ES-109. |
| RF-002 status transition validation incomplete | Accepted only because invalid transitions will be tested in ES-109. |
| RF-005 retention rules unresolved | Accepted because no retention assumptions are hard-coded and no real data is in scope. |
| RF-006 emergency-boundary behavior incomplete | Accepted only because no operational or emergency workflow is being released. |
| RF-007 build/test command evidence incomplete | Accepted only as a documentation/verification gap assigned to ES-109. |
Findings carried forward¶
- RF-001 → DEF-002 candidate.
- RF-002 → DEF-001 candidate.
- RF-003 → DEF-003 candidate.
- RF-005 → release/governance risk.
- RF-006 → DEF-004 candidate.
- RF-007 → DEF-005 candidate.
Review conclusion¶
The findings do not block conditional integration because they are visible, assigned, and appropriate for ES-109 Testing and Verification.
They would block release or pilot if left unresolved.