Skip to content

Repository Readiness Check

LMU/COICP Example

Repository Readiness Check Example

Confirm that the LMU/COICP repository is ready for controlled implementation, including branch workflow, commands, directories, evidence locations, review process, and known blockers.

ES-106 / ES-107 Repository Readiness

Example purpose

This artifact checks whether the repository is ready for ES-107 controlled implementation.

A repository is not ready just because files exist. It must have branch strategy, working tree expectations, command placeholders or concrete commands, evidence locations, review expectations, and known blockers.

Project

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control

Field Value
Artifact owner COICP Product Engineer
Primary reviewers Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer
Status Accepted with conditional blockers
Last updated 2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage ES-106 — Implementation Readiness
Project workspace target docs/project-workspace/implementation/repository_readiness_check.md

Implementation context

Field Value
Source design package ES-105 Design
Implementation readiness stage ES-106 — Implementation Readiness
Controlled implementation stage ES-107 — Controlled Implementation
Implementation baseline produced LMU-COICP-IMPL-001
Integrated baseline expected next LMU-COICP-INT-001
Candidate expected after testing LMU-COICP-RC-001
Downstream release posture Internal engineering review only
Planned downstream review environment LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Planned downstream dataset Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
AI Incident Summary Deferred / disabled
Operational pilot Not approved

Repository state

Check Status Notes
Working tree clean Yes Confirm before branch creation.
Branch strategy defined Yes See branch_and_workflow_plan.md.
Build command known Conditional Depends on selected implementation stack.
Test command known Conditional Depends on selected implementation stack.
Lint / format command known Conditional Depends on selected implementation stack.
Evidence locations defined Yes docs/project-workspace/implementation/ and future PR evidence.
Review process defined Yes See implementation_review_plan.md.
AI-use plan defined Yes See ai_use_plan.md.
Guardrails defined Yes See implementation_guardrails.md.
Work items defined Yes See implementation_work_items.md.

Required directories

docs/project-workspace/implementation/
src/
tests/

Optional future evidence locations:

docs/project-workspace/implementation/pr-evidence/
docs/project-workspace/implementation/reviews/
docs/project-workspace/implementation/ai-use/

Blocking issues

Issue Status Treatment
Build/test commands are not yet concrete. Conditional blocker Fill in before code branch begins or record stack-specific commands outside example scope.
Implementation stack selection may need to be finalized before coding. Conditional blocker Confirm stack or keep implementation evidence illustrative.
Retention rules remain unresolved. Not a coding blocker for core workflow Do not hard-code retention.
AI Incident Summary inclusion undecided. Not a core workflow blocker Defer or feature-gate AI.
Emergency-boundary wording requires Campus Safety review. Not a core coding blocker Preserve emergency exclusion and review in ES-108/ES-109.

Readiness decision

Repository conditionally ready for controlled implementation.

Core work may proceed once build/test/lint commands are added or the example explicitly records that stack-specific commands are outside the example scope.

Continue to Implementation Review Plan

Define review scope, reviewer roles, PR evidence, and merge gates.

Open Implementation Review Plan →