Skip to content

Rollback and Stop Plan

LMU/COICP Example

Rollback and Stop Plan Example

Define LMU stop criteria, pause options, reviewer access removal, synthetic dataset reset, restart criteria, evidence preservation, and return-to-stage guidance for RC-001 internal review.

ES-111 Rollback LMU Stop Criteria

Example purpose

This artifact defines when LMU must pause, stop, restrict, or roll back the RC-001 internal engineering review.

Because this is not production, rollback means stopping review, removing reviewer access, resetting synthetic data, preserving evidence, and returning to the appropriate ETIS stage.

Project

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control

Field Value
Artifact owner LMU COICP Product Owner
Primary reviewers Product Engineer, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Architecture Review Board chair
Status Accepted for internal engineering review
Last updated 2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage ES-111 — Operational Readiness
Project workspace target docs/project-workspace/operations/rollback_and_stop_plan.md

Stop criteria

Criterion Trigger Authority Action Evidence
Real incident data entered Any actual LMU incident detail appears Product Owner / Compliance Stop review and quarantine/remove data Data incident record
Sensitive data entered Medical, law enforcement, student conduct, or personal sensitive data appears Compliance Reviewer Stop review Data incident record
Unauthorized access Any non-approved account accesses environment IT Security Reviewer Disable access and stop review if needed Access incident record
AI Incident Summary active Any AI summary control appears AI Review Lead Disable and stop review until confirmed AI stop record
Missing evidence event Synthetic state change lacks expected EvidenceEvent Architecture Review Board Chair Stop affected workflow Defect update
Emergency workflow misuse Emergency scenario handled as ordinary COICP case Campus Safety Liaison Stop scenario and redirect Boundary incident record
Scope confusion persists Reviewer treats environment as pilot Product Owner Pause and re-communicate Communication record
Defect makes review unsafe Known defect blocks safe synthetic review Product Engineer Pause workflow and return to testing Defect update

Pause / restrict options

  • Pause all review sessions.
  • Restrict review to Product Engineer and Architecture Review Board.
  • Remove one reviewer group.
  • Disable affected workflow.
  • Reset Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset.
  • Reissue transition message.
  • Keep AI Incident Summary disabled.
  • Return specific defect to ES-109 Testing.
  • Repeat release or operational readiness if scope changes.

Restart criteria

  • Stop trigger resolved.
  • Responsible LMU owner records corrective action.
  • Product Owner approves restart.
  • Compliance confirms data boundary if data was involved.
  • IT confirms access boundary if access was involved.
  • AI reviewer confirms AI-disabled status if AI was involved.
  • Architecture Review Board confirms evidence path if evidence was involved.
  • Campus Safety confirms emergency-boundary response if emergency scenario was involved.

Return-to-stage guidance

Issue Return To
Implementation defect ES-107 Controlled Implementation
Integration inconsistency ES-108 Integration
Failed or missing verification ES-109 Testing and Verification
Release scope change ES-110 Release Readiness
Operational support/scope issue ES-111 Operational Readiness
Deployment environment issue ES-112 Deployment and Transition
Monitoring observation ES-113 Monitoring and Operations
Improvement prioritization ES-114 Stewardship

Planned rollback validation for ES-112

ES-112 must validate:

  • disabling a synthetic reviewer account;
  • resetting the Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset;
  • confirming AI Incident Summary remains disabled after reset;
  • preserving deployment and monitoring evidence;
  • reissuing transition communication.

Stop decision

Stop controls are sufficient for LMU internal engineering review.

They are not sufficient for production or operational pilot.

Continue to User Transition Plan

Define reviewer onboarding and the operational limits LMU reviewers must hear before deployment.

Open User Transition Plan →