Next-Cycle Recommendations¶
Example purpose¶
This artifact recommends the next LMU/COICP engineering cycle.
The recommendation is direct: do not expand to operational pilot. Fix trustworthiness gaps and repeat readiness review.
Project¶
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact owner | LMU COICP Product Owner |
| Primary reviewers | Product Engineer, Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison |
| Status | Accepted for next-cycle planning |
| Last updated | 2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage | ES-114 — Stewardship |
| Project workspace target | docs/project-workspace/stewardship/next_cycle_recommendations.md |
Recommendation summary¶
The next engineering cycle should not expand to operational pilot.
It should focus on closing release-blocking trustworthiness gaps:
- evidence write failure behavior;
- handoff evidence completeness;
- access-control matrix verification;
- invalid status transition validation;
- emergency-boundary warning language;
- sensitive-data cleanup procedure;
- AI disablement discipline.
Recommended routing¶
| Recommendation | Evidence | Route | Owner | Priority |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fix invalid status transition validation. | DEF-001 | ES-107 | Product Engineer | High |
| Fix handoff evidence gaps. | MON-OBS-003 | ES-107 | Product Engineer / Architecture Review Board | High |
| Integrate and review implementation fixes. | defect learning | ES-108 | Architecture Review Board | High |
| Build evidence write failure simulation and verify safe failure. | DEF-003, guardrail monitoring | ES-109 | Architecture Review Board | High |
| Complete access-control matrix tests. | DEF-002, access monitoring | ES-109 | IT Security Reviewer | High |
| Retest emergency-boundary scenario after wording change. | COICP-SYN-322, feedback | ES-109 | Campus Safety / Product Engineer | High |
| Repeat release readiness before pilot. | release decision, stewardship summary | ES-110 | Product Owner | High |
| Define sensitive-data cleanup procedure. | incident response question | ES-111 / Governance | Compliance Reviewer | Medium |
| Preserve internal-review-only communication. | feedback synthesis | ES-112 | Product Owner | Medium |
| Keep AI Incident Summary disabled until full readiness cycle. | AI learning | ES-110 | AI Reviewer | High |
Continue / pause / stop recommendation¶
Continue internal engineering review with conditions.
Do not expand to operational pilot.
Begin a targeted remediation and verification cycle.
Repeat release readiness before any pilot decision.
Next-cycle decision¶
The next cycle begins by returning to ES-107 and ES-109, not by moving forward to pilot.