Stewardship Plan¶
← Previous
Technical Debt and Improvement Backlog
Current
Stewardship Plan
Next →
Next-Cycle Recommendations
Example purpose¶
This artifact defines the stewardship plan for LMU/COICP after the RC-001 internal engineering review.
Stewardship is the mechanism that prevents lessons from disappearing and prevents the project from drifting into pilot before the evidence supports it.
Project¶
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact owner | LMU COICP Product Owner |
| Primary reviewers | Product Engineer, Campus Operations lead, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Architecture Review Board chair, Campus Safety liaison |
| Status | Accepted for next-cycle stewardship |
| Last updated | 2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage | ES-114 — Stewardship |
| Project workspace target | docs/project-workspace/stewardship/stewardship_plan.md |
Stewardship owners¶
| Area | LMU Owner | Responsibility | Review Cadence |
|---|---|---|---|
| Product scope | COICP Product Owner | Maintain internal-review boundary and approve scope changes. | Each review cycle |
| Evidence trust | Architecture Review Board Chair | Own evidence write failure learning, handoff evidence gaps, and verification routing. | Until B-001 and B-004 close |
| Access control | IT Security Reviewer | Own role matrix and denied-action verification. | Until B-002 closes |
| Workflow integrity | Product Engineer | Own status transition fix and handoff workflow repair. | Until B-003 and B-004 close |
| Campus Operations usability | Campus Operations lead | Own intake and closure rationale feedback. | Each design cycle |
| Emergency boundary | Campus Safety Liaison | Own warning-language review and emergency scenario retest. | Until B-008 closes |
| AI governance | AI Reviewer | Keep AI disabled and define future readiness requirements. | Each release cycle |
| Data governance | Compliance Reviewer | Maintain sample-data-only rule and cleanup expectations. | Each review cycle |
Stewardship decision points¶
- Re-run ES-107 after status validation and handoff evidence fixes.
- Re-run ES-108 after implementation fixes are integrated.
- Re-run ES-109 after evidence failure test support exists.
- Re-run ES-109 after access matrix tests are created.
- Re-run ES-110 before any operational pilot.
- Re-run ES-111 and ES-112 if operational scope expands.
- Keep AI disabled unless a future full AI readiness cycle approves it.
Governance updates needed¶
- Define sensitive-data cleanup procedure.
- Define retention expectations before production-like data.
- Define AI readiness requirements before AI summary work resumes.
- Define pilot approval criteria.
- Define minimum evidence requirements for cross-office handoff.
- Define emergency-boundary wording standard.
Stewardship decision¶
The project remains in stewardship while the next remediation and verification cycle begins.