Integration Example

LMU/COICP Example

Integration Example

Follow LMU/COICP as controlled implementation evidence becomes the integrated baseline LMU-COICP-INT-001, with PR review, traceability review, AI review, guardrail review, verification findings, decision evidence, and handoff to ES-109 testing.

ES-108 Integration Package LMU INT-001

Example AreaLMU/COICP

Current PageIntegration Example

FocusLMU/COICP integration package

UseRead completed ES-108 artifacts

Repository Areadocs/examples/lmu-coicp/integration/

← Back Implementation Summary

Current Integration Example

Next → Code Review Overview

Purpose

This section contains the completed ES-108 — Integration example for the LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform.

This package is the integration record for LMU-COICP-INT-001, the shared baseline created from the first controlled implementation increment. It does not approve release or pilot. It decides whether the implementation increment is traceable, reviewed, guarded, and stable enough to hand to ES-109 Testing and Verification.

Integration context

Field	Value
Integrated baseline	LMU-COICP-INT-001
Candidate expected after testing	LMU-COICP-RC-001
Integration decision posture	Accepted with follow-up
Target testing posture	Internal engineering review candidate only
Planned review environment	LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Planned dataset for downstream review	Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
Planned synthetic records	421
Planned reviewer accounts	24
Planned review window	March 18–22, 2026
AI Incident Summary	Deferred / disabled
Operational pilot	Not approved

Integrated baseline

LMU-COICP-INT-001 includes:

• IncidentRecord entity;
• EvidenceEvent entity;
• create synthetic incident workflow;
• partial status and handoff update workflow;
• basic access-control checks;
• initial validation and error behavior;
• AI Incident Summary deferment;
• no operational pilot capability;
• no real incident workflow.

Recommended workflow

Code Review Overview
      ↓
Pull Request Review Record
      ↓
Traceability Review
      ↓
AI Implementation Review
      ↓
Guardrail Review
      ↓
Integration Plan
      ↓
Integration Verification Record
      ↓
Review Findings
      ↓
Integration Decision Record
      ↓
Integration Readiness Summary
      ↓
ES-109 Testing and Verification

Repository location

docs/examples/lmu-coicp/integration/

In a project workspace, the comparable evidence would normally live under:

docs/project-workspace/integration/

Example set

01

Code Review Overview

Define the LMU integration review scope, branches, reviewed work items, and risks.

02

Pull Request Review Record

Record PR review evidence, reviewers, checks, comments, and follow-up.

03

Traceability Review

Confirm implementation changes trace to requirements, design, work items, and evidence.

04

AI Implementation Review

Review AI-assisted engineering, rejected AI shortcuts, and human verification.

05

Guardrail Review

Check evidence, access, AI, emergency-boundary, retention, and direct-update guardrails.

06

Integration Plan

Define controlled merge order, pre-merge checks, post-merge checks, rollback, and risks.

07

Integration Verification Record

Record integration verification results, conditional checks, and remaining gaps.

08

Review Findings

Record findings that become DEF-001 through DEF-005 in testing.

09

Integration Decision Record

Record the integration decision, risks accepted, and ES-109 testing handoff.

10

Integration Readiness Summary

Summarize readiness for ES-109 Testing and Verification.

LMU Integration Boundary

Integration accepts LMU-COICP-INT-001 into the shared baseline with follow-up. It does not approve RC-001, internal review, deployment, or pilot.

Begin with Code Review Overview

Start by reviewing the scope and objectives for the LMU core implementation increment.

Open Code Review Overview →