AI Monitoring Record
LMU/COICP Example
AI Monitoring Record Example
Confirm LMU/COICP AI Incident Summary remained disabled, no official AI summary path existed, manual workflow remained available, and future AI monitoring requirements remain visible.
ES-113
AI Monitoring
Disabled Capability
Example purpose
This artifact records AI monitoring during ES-113.
AI monitoring verifies that the deployed LMU/COICP internal review environment preserved the release and deployment decision: AI Incident Summary is disabled.
Project
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control
| Field |
Value |
| Artifact owner |
LMU AI Review Lead |
| Primary reviewers |
Product owner, product engineer, Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, Compliance reviewer |
| Status |
AI-disabled boundary held |
| Last updated |
2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage |
ES-113 — Monitoring and Operations |
| Project workspace target |
docs/project-workspace/monitoring/ai_monitoring_record.md |
AI status
AI Incident Summary remained disabled for the LMU/COICP internal engineering review deployment.
AI monitoring register
| Date |
Check |
Result |
Evidence |
Notes |
| Mar 18 |
AI feature flag inspected before reviewer access |
Pass |
AI reviewer note |
Summary feature disabled |
| Mar 19 |
Campus Operations intake screens inspected |
Pass |
UI inspection |
No AI summary panel |
| Mar 20 |
Handoff workflow inspected |
Pass |
UI inspection |
No AI draft generation path |
| Mar 21 |
Campus Safety boundary scenario inspected |
Pass |
UI inspection |
No AI classification or recommendation |
| Mar 22 |
Review closeout inspection |
Pass |
AI reviewer note |
AI remained disabled throughout |
AI boundary checks
| Boundary |
Result |
| No AI draft summary button shown |
Pass |
| No AI-generated summary created |
Pass |
| No AI output entered official record |
Pass |
| No AI escalation, closure, or ownership recommendation |
Pass |
| Manual incident workflow available without AI |
Pass |
| No prohibited data sent to AI service |
Pass because no AI service path active |
| No reviewer confusion about AI being available |
Pass |
AI reviewer observations
- Campus Operations reviewers asked whether AI summaries would be enabled later.
- The AI reviewer explained that AI summary functionality remains out of scope until evidence, access, retention, and human review controls are implemented.
- No reviewer attempted to use AI summary functionality because no AI control was visible.
- No AI-generated content appeared in incident records.
AI concerns carried forward
| Concern |
Future Treatment |
| Human review workflow not implemented |
Required before AI enablement |
| Prompt context metadata unresolved |
Required before AI enablement |
| Rejected draft retention unresolved |
Required before AI enablement |
| Prohibited-data exclusion not tested for AI inputs |
Required before AI enablement |
| AI reviewer training not defined |
Required before AI pilot |
AI monitoring decision
AI boundary held. Continue internal engineering review with AI Incident Summary disabled.
Continue to User Feedback Log
Record feedback from Campus Operations, Campus Safety, Residence Life, IT, Compliance, and architecture reviewers.
Open User Feedback Log →