Skip to content

Guardrail Verification

LMU/COICP Example

Guardrail Verification Example

Verify LMU/COICP guardrails for EvidenceEvent creation, AI deferment, access checks, emergency-boundary handling, retention assumptions, direct-update bypass prevention, and release-readiness limits.

ES-109 Guardrails LMU Verification

Example purpose

This artifact verifies ES-109 guardrails.

Guardrails protect COICP from becoming an untrustworthy incident system. In ES-109, some normal-path guardrails pass, but failure-path and coverage gaps remain release blockers for pilot.

Project

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control

Field Value
Artifact owner Architecture Review Board chair
Primary reviewers Product Engineer, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison
Status Accepted with incomplete guardrail verification
Last updated 2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage ES-109 — Testing and Verification
Project workspace target docs/project-workspace/testing/guardrail_verification.md

Testing context

Field Value
Integrated baseline under test LMU-COICP-INT-001
Candidate produced by testing LMU-COICP-RC-001
Target release posture Internal engineering review only
Planned review environment LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Planned dataset Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
Planned synthetic records 421
Planned reviewer accounts 24
Planned review window March 18–22, 2026
AI Incident Summary Deferred / disabled
Operational pilot Not approved

Guardrail verification register

Guardrail Verification Method Test Case Result Evidence Notes
G-001 Official state changes create EvidenceEvent Integration / failure-path TC-001, TC-005, TC-007 Partial test_execution_record.md Normal paths pass; failure path blocked.
G-002 AI output not official without human review Inspection TC-008 Pass ai_verification_record.md AI Incident Summary deferred/disabled.
G-003 Access checks before protected actions Access test TC-004, TC-011 Partial test_execution_record.md Limited role set tested.
G-004 Out-of-scope/emergency incidents not normal workflow Integration / safety test TC-003, TC-012 Pass / partial test_execution_record.md Out-of-scope category blocked; emergency test requires formalization.
G-005 Retention assumptions not hard-coded Inspection TC-010 Pass regression_check_record.md No final retention rule coded.
G-006 Direct updates do not bypass evidence Review / integration TC-005, TC-007 Partial test_execution_record.md Failure path still open.

Guardrail failures

No confirmed normal-path guardrail violations were found.

Guardrails not fully verified

Guardrail Gap Release-Readiness Implication
G-001 Evidence write failure path blocked/unverified. High-risk release concern.
G-003 Full access-control matrix incomplete. Medium release concern.
G-004 Emergency-boundary test not fully formalized. Medium release concern.
G-006 Direct-update bypass prevention requires deeper failure-path review. High-risk release concern.

Guardrail verification conclusion

Guardrails are preserved on normal paths but not fully verified for pilot readiness.

ES-110 may evaluate the baseline for internal engineering review only. It should not treat guardrail verification as sufficient for operational pilot.

Continue to AI Verification Record

Verify AI deferment, disabled AI status, and future AI testing gaps.

Open AI Verification Record →