Implementation Readiness Summary¶

Example AreaLMU/COICP

Current PageImplementation Readiness Summary

FocusES-106 gate evidence

UseSummarize readiness for ES-107

Repository Areadocs/examples/lmu-coicp/implementation/

← Previous Implementation Review Plan

Current Implementation Readiness Summary

Next → Implementation Log

Example purpose¶

This artifact summarizes the ES-106 implementation readiness package.

It records whether branch workflow, work items, guardrails, AI-use expectations, verification prechecks, repository readiness, and review expectations are clear enough for ES-107 — Controlled Implementation to begin.

Project¶

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control¶

Field	Value
Artifact owner	COICP Product Engineer
Primary reviewers	Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison
Status	Accepted with conditional blockers
Last updated	2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage	ES-106 — Implementation Readiness
Project workspace target	`docs/project-workspace/implementation/implementation_readiness_summary.md`
Previous stage	ES-105 — Design
Next stage	ES-107 — Controlled Implementation

Implementation context¶

Field	Value
Source design package	ES-105 Design
Implementation readiness stage	ES-106 — Implementation Readiness
Controlled implementation stage	ES-107 — Controlled Implementation
Implementation baseline produced	LMU-COICP-IMPL-001
Integrated baseline expected next	LMU-COICP-INT-001
Candidate expected after testing	LMU-COICP-RC-001
Downstream release posture	Internal engineering review only
Planned downstream review environment	LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Planned downstream dataset	Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
AI Incident Summary	Deferred / disabled
Operational pilot	Not approved

Summary¶

ES-106 confirms readiness for controlled implementation of the first LMU/COICP implementation increment.

The readiness package defines branch workflow, traceable work items, implementation guardrails, AI-use expectations, verification prechecks, repository readiness, and review expectations.

Implementation can begin with the core synthetic incident workflow, evidence event behavior, and access-control checks, while AI Incident Summary remains conditional and may be deferred.

Completed artifacts¶

[x] implementation_readiness_overview.md
[x] branch_and_workflow_plan.md
[x] implementation_work_items.md
[x] implementation_guardrails.md
[x] ai_use_plan.md
[x] verification_precheck.md
[x] repository_readiness_check.md
[x] implementation_review_plan.md

Ready work items¶

IW-001 — IncidentRecord entity.
IW-002 — EvidenceEvent entity.
IW-003 — Create synthetic incident workflow.
IW-004 — Status and handoff update workflow.
IW-005 — Basic access check.
IW-007 — Error and exception behavior.

Conditional / deferred work items¶

Work Item	Status	Reason
IW-006 — AI draft summary boundary	Conditional / likely deferred	AI readiness and review workflow are not core to first increment.
IW-008 — Review package stub	Deferred	Review/export should wait until core evidence behavior stabilizes.

Blocking issues¶

Issue	Treatment
Concrete build/test/lint commands must be filled in once implementation stack is selected.	Conditional blocker before real coding.
Retention rules remain unresolved.	Do not hard-code retention.
AI Incident Summary inclusion remains undecided.	Defer or feature-gate.
Emergency-boundary wording requires Campus Safety review.	Preserve exclusion and review before downstream testing.

Readiness decision¶

ES-107 can begin conditionally.

Core implementation may begin after the repository branch is created and concrete build/test commands are added or stack-specific commands are documented as outside the example scope.

Continue to Implementation Log

Begin controlled implementation evidence by recording branches, work items, source design, verification, and status.

Open Implementation Log →