Skip to content

Test Execution Record

LMU/COICP Example

Test Execution Record Example

Record LMU/COICP ES-109 test execution results, including passed normal paths, failed status-transition validation, blocked evidence failure verification, partial access and emergency-boundary checks, retest needs, and release-readiness implications.

ES-109 Execution LMU Results

Example purpose

This artifact records ES-109 test execution.

Execution evidence shows what actually happened. It is not a marketing summary and not a release approval.

Project

LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform

Document control

Field Value
Artifact owner COICP Product Engineer
Primary reviewers Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison
Status Accepted with open defects
Last updated 2026-07-06
Related Engineering Stage ES-109 — Testing and Verification
Project workspace target docs/project-workspace/testing/test_execution_record.md

Testing context

Field Value
Integrated baseline under test LMU-COICP-INT-001
Candidate produced by testing LMU-COICP-RC-001
Target release posture Internal engineering review only
Planned review environment LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment
Planned dataset Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset
Planned synthetic records 421
Planned reviewer accounts 24
Planned review window March 18–22, 2026
AI Incident Summary Deferred / disabled
Operational pilot Not approved

Execution register

Date Test Case Tester Result Evidence Notes
ES-109 baseline TC-001 Product Engineer Pass create incident check COICP-SYN-001 created with EvidenceEvent.
ES-109 baseline TC-002 Product Engineer Pass validation check Missing description rejected.
ES-109 baseline TC-003 Product Engineer Pass category check Out-of-scope category blocked.
ES-109 baseline TC-004 IT security reviewer Pass with limited role set access check Full role matrix still needed.
ES-109 baseline TC-005 Product Engineer / Architecture Review Board Partial status update check Evidence event created in basic handoff case.
ES-109 baseline TC-006 Product Engineer Fail status transition check Invalid transition not consistently rejected.
ES-109 baseline TC-007 Architecture Review Board chair Blocked failure simulation unavailable Requires simulation/manual verification.
ES-109 baseline TC-008 AI reviewer Pass AI path inspection No official AI summary path exists.
ES-109 baseline TC-009 Product Engineer Pass manual workflow check Core workflow does not require AI.
ES-109 baseline TC-010 Compliance reviewer / Architecture Review Board Pass code inspection Retention rule not hard-coded.
ES-109 baseline TC-011 IT security reviewer Partial denied response inspection Needs broader role and protected-data coverage.
ES-109 baseline TC-012 Product Engineer / Campus Safety liaison Planned / partial emergency-boundary note Focused emergency-boundary test required before pilot.

Failed tests

Test Case Failure Defect ID Retest Needed
TC-006 Invalid status transition not consistently rejected. DEF-001 Yes

Blocked and partial tests

Test Case Result Required Action
TC-007 Blocked Add evidence write failure simulation or manual verification method.
TC-004 Partial Add full access-control matrix.
TC-005 Partial Add broader update and handoff evidence cases.
TC-011 Partial Add protected-detail denial tests across roles.
TC-012 Partial Execute focused emergency/prohibited category test with Campus Safety.

Execution conclusion

The integrated baseline passes the basic create incident, validation, category scope, AI deferment, manual workflow, and retention-inspection checks.

It does not pass cleanly enough for operational pilot readiness.

Continue to Defect Log

Record defects, severity, owners, retest needs, and release-readiness implications.

Open Defect Log →