Implementation Evidence¶
Example purpose¶
This artifact summarizes the implementation evidence produced during ES-107.
It does not claim the implementation is fully integrated or release-ready. It identifies what evidence exists, which guardrails were checked, what remains incomplete, and what must be reviewed during ES-108.
Project¶
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact owner | COICP Product Engineer |
| Primary reviewers | Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, AI reviewer, Compliance reviewer, Campus Safety liaison |
| Status | Accepted for ES-107 implementation evidence |
| Last updated | 2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage | ES-107 — Controlled Implementation |
| Project workspace target | docs/project-workspace/implementation/implementation_evidence.md |
Implementation context¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Source design package | ES-105 Design |
| Implementation readiness stage | ES-106 — Implementation Readiness |
| Controlled implementation stage | ES-107 — Controlled Implementation |
| Implementation baseline produced | LMU-COICP-IMPL-001 |
| Integrated baseline expected next | LMU-COICP-INT-001 |
| Candidate expected after testing | LMU-COICP-RC-001 |
| Downstream release posture | Internal engineering review only |
| Planned downstream review environment | LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment |
| Planned downstream dataset | Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset |
| AI Incident Summary | Deferred / disabled |
| Operational pilot | Not approved |
Evidence summary¶
| Work Item | Code / Artifact | Evidence Produced | Guardrails Checked | Verification |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| IW-001 | IncidentRecord entity |
entity fields, validation notes | scope and data constraints | field inspection |
| IW-002 | EvidenceEvent entity |
event fields, evidence notes | G-001, G-006 | field inspection |
| IW-003 | Create synthetic incident workflow | creation event behavior | G-001, G-003, G-004 | workflow check |
| IW-004 | Status and handoff update workflow | partial update evidence behavior | G-001, G-006 | status transition review pending |
| IW-005 | Basic access check | denied-action behavior notes | G-003 | access review pending |
| IW-006 | AI Incident Summary | defer decision | G-002 preserved by non-implementation | review note |
| IW-007 | Error and exception behavior | partial failure behavior notes | G-001, G-003, G-004 | failure review pending |
Guardrail confirmation¶
- [x] Evidence-producing behavior preserved for create workflow.
- [x] Access-control behavior introduced for protected actions.
- [x] AI-review behavior preserved by deferring AI Incident Summary.
- [x] Error handling implemented or deferred with rationale.
- [x] Scope boundaries preserved.
- [x] Logs alone were not treated as user-facing review evidence.
- [x] Retention rules were not hard-coded.
- [x] Emergency workflow was not implemented as normal COICP workflow.
- [x] No operational pilot behavior was introduced.
Known evidence gaps¶
- Status update evidence behavior requires additional verification.
- Evidence write failure handling requires focused review.
- Access-control tests need completion.
- Concrete build/test command evidence must be added when implementation stack is finalized.
- Review/export behavior remains deferred.
- AI draft retention remains unresolved because AI feature is deferred.
- Denied-action logging policy remains open.
- Emergency-boundary behavior requires Campus Safety review.
ES-108 integration review focus¶
ES-108 should focus on:
- whether
IncidentRecordandEvidenceEventremain consistent; - whether official create/update behavior requires evidence events;
- whether access checks occur before protected actions;
- whether failure paths fail safely;
- whether status transition validation is complete;
- whether AI deferral preserves the no-official-AI-summary guardrail;
- whether known gaps are acceptable for integration;
- whether the baseline is ready to become
LMU-COICP-INT-001.