AI Release Review¶
Example purpose¶
This artifact records the AI release review for LMU-COICP-RC-001.
The candidate does not release user-facing AI functionality. AI Incident Summary remains deferred and disabled. Engineering AI use during development was reviewed and accepted only with human verification.
Project¶
LMU Campus Operations and Incident Coordination Platform
Document control¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Artifact owner | LMU AI Reviewer |
| Primary reviewers | Product Engineer, Architecture Review Board chair, IT security reviewer, Compliance reviewer |
| Status | AI Incident Summary disabled |
| Last updated | 2026-07-06 |
| Related Engineering Stage | ES-110 — Release Readiness |
| Project workspace target | docs/project-workspace/release/ai_release_review.md |
Candidate context¶
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Candidate | LMU-COICP-RC-001 |
| Planned deployment ID | DEP-LMU-COICP-2026-03-18-001 |
| Planned review environment | LMU-COICP Internal Engineering Review Environment |
| Planned dataset | Spring Semester Synthetic Incident Dataset |
| Planned synthetic records | 421 |
| Planned reviewer accounts | 24 |
| Planned review window | March 18–22, 2026 |
| AI Incident Summary | Disabled |
| Operational pilot | Not approved |
AI release status¶
AI Incident Summary is deferred and disabled for LMU-COICP-RC-001.
AI capability review¶
| Capability | Status | Verification Evidence | Release Decision | Notes |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AI Incident Summary | Deferred / disabled | ai_verification_record.md |
Not released | No official AI summary path exists. |
| AI-assisted engineering work | Used during development | ai_assistance_log.md, ai_implementation_review.md |
Accepted with review | Guardrail-violating suggestions were rejected. |
AI controls¶
- [x] Human review required. Preserved by not enabling AI official-summary path.
- [x] AI output marked. Not applicable to user-facing release because feature disabled.
- [x] Rejection path exists. Deferred with AI feature.
- [x] Manual fallback exists. Core workflow works without AI.
- [x] Prohibited data excluded. No active AI data path.
- [x] AI-use evidence recorded. Engineering AI use recorded and reviewed.
- [x] No official AI-summary path exists in RC-001.
- [x] AI Incident Summary must remain disabled in ES-111, ES-112, and ES-113.
AI release risks¶
| Risk | Status | Decision |
|---|---|---|
| AI summary could be mistaken for official record. | Avoided by disabling feature. | Accept with AI disabled. |
| AI prompt metadata not finalized. | Deferred. | Must resolve before enabling AI. |
| AI rejected-draft retention unresolved. | Deferred. | Must resolve before enabling AI. |
| Prohibited-data exclusion not tested for AI inputs. | Deferred. | Required before AI release. |
| AI readiness skipped under pilot pressure. | Open governance risk. | Governance must block AI activation without full readiness cycle. |
Future AI release requirements¶
Before any user-facing AI summary feature is released, LMU must verify:
- draft generation;
- AI content marking;
- human accept;
- edit-and-accept;
- reject;
- accepted-summary evidence event;
- prohibited data exclusion;
- prompt context metadata;
- retention rule for drafts and rejected drafts;
- manual fallback when AI unavailable;
- no autonomous status, closure, escalation, or communications approval;
- release, operations, deployment, monitoring, stewardship, and governance controls.
AI release decision¶
AI Incident Summary is not released.
Release scope must state AI Incident Summary is disabled.